The debates related to weight loss have been ongoing for years on the same two fronts. One camp swears by cardio, long runs, cycling, stair climbing, the more sweat, the better. The other considers weight training the only saving path, because muscle raises metabolism, and the change reflected in the mirror can only be achieved this way. The third group, which has been getting louder over the last ten years, advocates for HIIT, saying: with short, intense intervals, you can achieve what the others do in hours in no time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All three sides refer to studies. All three sides show results. And all three sides are partly wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The meta-analyses accumulated since 2017, which will be reinforced at several points in 2024-2025, paint a clear picture of what actually works when the goal is fat loss and improving body composition. They do not say that one method wins and the other fails. They say that the three approaches, combined in a specific order, work much more effectively than separately. The difference lies in the details.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This article starts with the basics. We will look at how weight loss works biologically, what exactly HIIT, continuous moderate-intensity cardio, and weight training do to the body, and what the most reliable studies of recent years say. In the end, you will receive a specific weekly outline that you can adjust to your own level, and a list of the six most common mistakes that prevent most people from losing weight even when they try everything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
At Chili Fitness, we meet every week with members who have been training for six months and are not making progress. In almost every case, the same mistake is made: it was not the quantity of training that was wrong, but the type, the order, or the ratio of the two to each other. This is what the next thirty thousand characters are about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Weight training<\/p>\n
+12-15%<\/p>\n
increased resting metabolic rate after 6 months<\/p>\n <\/div>\n
HIIT<\/p>\n
+6-15%<\/p>\n
EPOC excess consumption for 24 hours post-exercise<\/p>\n <\/div>\n
LISS<\/p>\n
300-400<\/p>\n
kcal from a 60-minute moderate-intensity session<\/p>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Weight loss is not a trick and not magic. There is one rule without which no training will yield results: the number of calories burned daily exceeds the number of calories consumed daily. This is called a calorie deficit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The body uses energy through four main pathways:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This breakdown immediately shows why three workouts a week alone are not enough. A 60-minute strength workout burns about 300-400 kcal. An hour of HIIT burns 400-500. Even the most effective workout contributes only 5-10 percent of daily expenditure. The real work happens in the background, in metabolism.<\/strong> And this is where the quality of the chosen form of exercise comes into play.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Different forms of exercise affect different parameters. Some directly use calories during the workout. Some keep the metabolism elevated for 12-24 hours after the workout. Some reshape body composition in the long term, thereby increasing the basal metabolic rate overall. These are not competitors to each other, but different approaches, and none of them alone covers everything. This realization is the key without which the rest of the topic cannot be understood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Daily energy expenditure<\/p>\n Where does your daily calorie go?<\/p>\n An average adult uses about 2000-2500 kcal daily. Only a fraction of this comes from exercise. Your basal metabolic rate, daily movement, and digestion play a much larger role in weight loss than the gym itself.<\/p>\n\n Basal metabolic rate \u00b7 BMR<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 60-70%<\/p>\n What your body uses at rest, just to exist. Breathing, heartbeat, brain function, cell maintenance. A person weighing 75 kg has a BMR of about 1500-1700 kcal.<\/p>\n How to increase<\/strong> NEAT<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 15-20%<\/p>\n Non-exercise activity thermogenesis. Walking, typing, housework, climbing stairs, fidgeting in a chair. This is where the biggest difference can be between two people.<\/p>\n How to increase<\/strong> Thermal effect \u00b7 TEF<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 8-12%<\/p>\n The energy spent on digesting food. Protein 20-30%, carbohydrate 5-10%, fat 0-3% digestion cost. This is why you feel lighter in a deficit with high protein intake.<\/p>\n How to increase<\/strong> Exercise<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 10-20%<\/p>\n Conscious, targeted movement. Weight training, HIIT, cardio. A 60-minute strength workout uses 300-400 kcal. This is not the largest item, but it drives the long-term increase of the 01 number.<\/p>\n How to increase<\/strong> The formula<\/p>\n TDEE = BMR + NEAT + TEF + Exercise<\/p>\n Weight loss starts when the daily calorie intake is less than this total expenditure (TDEE). The calorie deficit is not a trick, but physics. The difference is not whether the deficit exists, but which of the four elements you increase to make it easier to maintain.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n The percentages refer to an average, moderately active adult. In professional athletes, exercise can account for 30-40 percent, while in a sedentary lifestyle, BMR can reach up to 75 percent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n HIIT, or High Intensity Interval Training, is high-intensity interval training. The model is simple: short, intense work periods (20-60 seconds) alternate with active rest periods (10-90 seconds). The entire block lasts 15-30 minutes, and by the end, there is really nothing left in you. Among the classic formats, Tabata (20 seconds of work, 10 seconds of rest, for eight rounds) is perhaps the most well-known, but there are countless variations: 30\/30, 40\/20, 60\/30 protocols with different forms of movement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n HIIT has exploded in popularity over the last decade for two reasons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The first is that it is an effective time investment. In a 20-minute HIIT session, you burn as many calories as in a 45-minute moderate-paced run. Research suggests that the energy expenditure per minute can be double or triple that of steady-state cardio.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second is the so-called EPOC effect<\/strong> (Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption). After intense exercise, the body operates with an elevated metabolism for several hours, even up to a whole day, because it needs to restore energy balance, muscle glycogen levels, and hormonal parameters. This is often referred to as \u201eafterburn.\u201d Research indicates that the HIIT EPOC effect increases daily total energy expenditure by 6-15 percent, which is not negligible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, HIIT has its limits. More than four HIIT sessions per week can lead to overtraining for most people. Recovery is insufficient, cortisol levels rise, and paradoxically, the body may even start to store fat due to chronic stress. The appropriate dose<\/strong>, is 2-3 HIIT sessions per week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n on well-chosen days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Did you know?<\/p>\n Who is it for? For someone who has limited time and already has a basic level of fitness. It is not the best entry point for complete beginners, as form deteriorates quickly under fatigue, and the risk of injury increases.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Steady moderate-intensity cardio: the classic approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n LISS, or Low Intensity Steady State, is the classic tool for weight loss in steady moderate-intensity cardio. This includes long walks, light jogging, cycling at a comfortable pace, swimming, and using the elliptical trainer at a moderate pace. The heart rate remains between 60-70 percent of the maximum, meaning you can talk, just not sing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The benefits of LISS are simple and real. First of all<\/strong>. everyone can handle it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Whether you are a complete beginner, returning after childbirth, or just want to move after a stressful week, steady cardio is gentle. You don\u2019t have to perform at maximum, and recovery after the workout is minimal. Secondly, fat metabolism works most efficiently here. At low intensity, the body prefers to use fat as fuel because it has the time. At high intensity, it switches to glucose because a faster source is needed.<\/strong>, This does not mean that LISS burns more fat overall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n , just that a larger proportion of the energy used comes from fat. However, total calorie expenditure is lower.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Its limitations are also realistic. One hour of LISS burns about 300-400 kcal, and there is no significant EPOC effect. If your time is limited and you can only fit in 2-3 sessions per week, LISS alone is not necessarily the most effective choice. It has no effect on muscle mass, and in very long durations (over 6-8 hours per week), it may start to break down muscle if protein intake is not high enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Who is it for? Everyone, as a supplement.<\/strong> 2-3 times a week, 30-50 minutes, at a low heart rate. Those who introduce it will experience that weight loss becomes more stable, stress levels decrease, and metabolism works more evenly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Heart rate zones \u00b7 LISS position<\/p>\n In which heart rate zone is LISS?<\/p>\n Your heart rate indicates, as a percentage of the maximum value, what fuel your body is processing and which energy system is activated. LISS lives in Z2, where fat is the dominant source, and recovery is the fastest.<\/p>\n\n Calculate your own Z2 zone<\/p>\n Max heart rate \u2248 220 \u2212 age<\/p>\n The LISS zone is between 60-70 percent of this. Some reference values for people with an average resting heart rate:<\/p>\n\n 25 years<\/p>\n 117-137<\/p>\n bpm \u00b7 max 195<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 35 years<\/p>\n 111-130<\/p>\n bpm \u00b7 max 185<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 45 years<\/p>\n 105-122<\/p>\n bpm \u00b7 max 175<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 55 years<\/p>\n 99-115<\/p>\n bpm \u00b7 max 165<\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n The 220 \u2212 age is a simplified formula. The Tanaka formula is more accurate: 211 \u2212 0.64 \u00d7 age. Measuring your own max with a heart rate monitor is an even better reference.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n Where it is strong<\/p>\n <\/div>\n Recovery and fat metabolism<\/p>\n Where it is limited<\/p>\n <\/div>\n In terms of time and muscle<\/p>\n How to use it<\/p>\n <\/div>\n In the weekly program<\/p>\n Quick test without a heart rate monitor<\/p>\n The talk test is almost as accurate as a sports watch. If you can speak in full sentences while running or cycling, you are in Z2, which is the LISS zone. If only fragmented words come out, you have moved to Z3. If you are panting and can only get out one word at a time, you are in Z4 or above.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n And here comes the most surprising chapter. Many still believe that weight training is only necessary for building muscle. Those who want to lose weight should run, cycle, or do HIIT. However, research after 2010 consistently shows the opposite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Weight training affects weight loss in three ways.<\/p>\n\n\n\n First, direct calorie expenditure.<\/strong> A 60-minute serious strength workout uses 250-450 kcal, which is not a record in itself, but not insignificant either.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Second, EPOC effect.<\/strong> In the 12-24 hours after an intense strength workout, metabolism is elevated by 5-8 percent because the body restores muscle tissue and the hormonal system. A 70 kg person has a basal metabolic rate of around 1500-1700 kcal, meaning this adds an extra 75-130 kcal per training day, just for recovery. With four weight training sessions a week, this amounts to an additional 300-500 kcal, which can equal a whole day's worth of meals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thirdly, and this is the key, muscle mass raises the basal metabolic rate in the long term.<\/strong> One pound of muscle burns about 15-20 kcal daily, just by existing. If you build two pounds of muscle in six months, that means an extra 30-40 kcal per day, which translates to 11-15 thousand extra kcal annually, without doing cardio even once.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another important effect of weight training is seen in the calorie deficit. If you reduce calories and do not train with weights, 25-30 percent of the weight loss comes from muscle, not fat. However, if you do weight training while in a deficit, this ratio decreases to 5-10 percent.<\/strong>. In other words, among the pounds on the same scale, your body looks completely different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is what body recomposition<\/strong> is known as in the literature, and it is one of the central themes of the 2024-2025 research. You simultaneously reduce body fat and increase muscle mass, while the scale may not even budge. However, in the mirror, a completely different person stands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Who is it for? Everyone, without exception.<\/strong> Weight training 2-4 times a week is the cornerstone of weight loss, not an optional supplement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Comparative table<\/p>\n The three types of training on one page<\/p>\n Modern sports dietetics and exercise science have reached the point where it is not seeking answers to the \u201ewhich is better\u201d question, but rather the \u201ewhich combination is the most effective\u201d<\/strong> question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The meta-analysis published by Wewege and colleagues in 2017, which has since been updated multiple times, compared 39 randomized controlled trials that compared HIIT and continuous moderate-intensity cardio in terms of weight loss. The final result: 1-2 percent more body fat loss with HIIT over the same duration. The difference is small, and both work in a calorie deficit, but the time efficiency clearly belongs to HIIT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The 2012 Duke University study published by Willis and colleagues, which remains one of the most widely cited to this day, examined three groups over 8 months: only aerobic exercise, only weight training, and combined aerobic and weight training. The combined group lost the most fat and retained the most muscle. The only aerobic group also lost muscle mass. The only weight training group lost less in body weight, but achieved better body composition changes<\/strong>, than the only aerobic group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The systematic review by O\u2019Donoghue and colleagues published in 2023 analyzed 67 studies and concluded that three weight training sessions per week plus 2-3 cardio sessions<\/strong> (HIIT, LISS, or a mix of both) brings significantly better body composition changes than any approach alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The summary published in the 2024 Sports Medicine journal examined the underlying factors: sleep, protein intake, and NEAT. The conclusion: the choice of training type accounts for only 35-40 percent of the likelihood of weight loss success.<\/strong> The rest runs on the account of recovery, protein intake, and daily activity level (step count).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Science is therefore unified: the combined approach wins, and the background factors play an equal role.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Practically, this means that you perform some form of movement 5-6 times a week, and there is a specific order among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Weekly outline<\/p>\n The weekly program for the three levels<\/p>\n Beginner \u00b7 first 12 weeks<\/p>\n Intermediate \u00b7 3-12 months<\/p>\n Advanced \u00b7 over 1 year<\/p>\n HIIT and weight training should not be scheduled within 24 hours of each other. The strength level of weight training deteriorates with glycogen depletion after HIIT. A good order: weight training day, followed by LISS or rest the next day, and HIIT on the third day.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n The order is not accidental. Weight training is the central pillar<\/strong>, because it drives the change in body composition. HIIT is the accelerator of calorie deficit and metabolic turbo. LISS supports recovery and is part of daily movement needs. If you skip any element, the system falters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n An important rule in planning: HIIT and weight training should not be scheduled within 24 hours of each other, as glycogen depletion after HIIT deteriorates the strength level of weight training, and recovery also suffers. The good order: weight training day, then LISS or full rest the next day, HIIT on the third day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For women, an additional consideration is that in the second half of the cycle (luteal phase), it may be worth reducing the amount of HIIT and shifting the focus more towards LISS. The body is more sensitive to stressors in this phase, and too much intense work can be counterproductive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At Chili Fitness, we meet weekly with those who have been training for six months but still aren't moving. Almost always, the same mistakes come back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 01<\/p>\n Only cardio, no weights<\/p>\n Five runs a week, no weight training. Muscle decreases, metabolism slows down, and in three months you can eat less for the same weight. Solution: 2-3 weight training sessions per week immediately.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 02<\/p>\n HIIT every day<\/p>\n Four to five HIIT sessions a week, cortisol through the roof, recovery on the floor. Result: exhaustion, weight maintenance, without fat loss. Solution: a maximum of 2-3 HIIT sessions per week.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 03<\/p>\n Too little protein<\/p>\n Weight training and deficit are in place, but protein is only 40-50 g per day. Muscle is lost under the deficit, not fat. Solution: 1.6-2 g per kilogram of body weight.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 04<\/p>\n \u201eI eat healthily\u201d<\/p>\n Healthy food is not the same as being in a deficit. Avocado, nuts, olive oil are calorie-dense. Solution: 2-4 weeks of precise calorie and macro counting.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n 05<\/p>\n Too large a deficit<\/p>\n Minus 800-1000 kcal daily, and you're already in a catabolic state, muscle loss, hormonal problems. Solution: minus 300-500 kcal, sustainable pace.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
By building muscle. An additional kg of muscle means an extra 15-20 kcal daily, just by existing.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n
Daily 8000-10000 steps, standing workstation, short walk after every meal.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n
6-2 g of protein per kilogram of body weight, unprocessed, natural ingredients.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n
3-5 structured workouts per week, based on weight training, supplemented with HIIT and LISS cardio.<\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n What does HIIT do to the body?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
In the 24 hours following a well-structured 20-minute HIIT workout, your body uses approximately as much more energy as would be expended during a 30-minute walk. This is the afterburn effect, and neither steady cardio nor light weight training produces this effect to such an extent.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
Weight training and weight loss<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n \n Type of training<\/th>\n Calories\/hour<\/th>\n EPOC effect<\/th>\n Effect on muscle<\/th>\n Weekly dose<\/th>\n <\/tr><\/thead>\n \n Weight training<\/td>\n 250-450 kcal<\/td>\n 5-8% \/ 24 hours<\/td>\n builds and protects<\/td>\n 2-4 times<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n HIIT<\/td>\n 400-600 kcal<\/td>\n 6-15% \/ 24 hours<\/td>\n preserves<\/td>\n 2-3 times<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n \n LISS cardio<\/td>\n 300-400 kcal<\/td>\n negligible<\/td>\n neutral, excessive harms<\/td>\n 2-4 times<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n What does the research say<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The winning recipe: how to combine them in a week<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
The six most common mistakes that prevent you from losing weight<\/h3>\n\n\n\n